Today's Date: Add To Favorites
Supreme Court blocks some redrawn North Carolina districts
Court Watch | 2018/02/07 22:41
The U.S. Supreme Court told North Carolina officials late Tuesday they must use some but not all of the state's legislative

districts that other federal judges redrew for this year's elections.

The justices partially granted the request of Republican lawmakers who contend the House and Senate maps they voted for last

summer were legal and didn't need to be altered.

A three-judge panel determined those GOP-approved boundaries contained racial bias left over from maps originally approved in

2011 and violated the state constitution. So the lower-court judges hired a special master who changed about two dozen

districts in all. The judges approved them last month.

The Supreme Court's order means more than half of those districts redrawn by Stanford University law professor Nathaniel Persily

will revert to their shapes from last summer. The order said House district changes made in the counties that include Charlotte

and Raleigh because of state constitutional concerns are blocked while the full case is appealed, but changes made elsewhere to

alleviate racial bias must be used.

The maps containing the partial changes will be used when candidate filing for all 170 General Assembly seats begins next

Monday.

Boundaries approved by the General Assembly last August kept Republicans in a position to retain veto-proof majorities in the

chambers, which has helped them advance their conservative-leaning agenda this decade. But Democrats are bolstered after

successful elections in other states last year. Tuesday's ruling means Democrats could find it harder to win more House districts

than they hoped.

Dozens of North Carolina voters originally were successful in overturning the 2011 districts as racial gerrymanders. They

subsequently asked Chief Justice John Roberts, who receives appeals from the state, to allow the lower court's directive and
The U.S. Supreme Court told North Carolina officials late Tuesday they must use some but not all of the state's legislative districts that other federal judges redrew for this year's elections.

The justices partially granted the request of Republican lawmakers who contend the House and Senate maps they voted for last summer were legal and didn't need to be altered.

A three-judge panel determined those GOP-approved boundaries contained racial bias left over from maps originally approved in 2011 and violated the state constitution. So the lower-court judges hired a special master who changed about two dozen districts in all. The judges approved them last month.

The Supreme Court's order means more than half of those districts redrawn by Stanford University law professor Nathaniel Persily will revert to their shapes from last summer. The order said House district changes made in the counties that include Charlotte and Raleigh because of state constitutional concerns are blocked while the full case is appealed, but changes made elsewhere to alleviate racial bias must be used.

The maps containing the partial changes will be used when candidate filing for all 170 General Assembly seats begins next Monday.

Boundaries approved by the General Assembly last August kept Republicans in a position to retain veto-proof majorities in the chambers, which has helped them advance their conservative-leaning agenda this decade. But Democrats are bolstered after successful elections in other states last year. Tuesday's ruling means Democrats could find it harder to win more House districts than they hoped.

Dozens of North Carolina voters originally were successful in overturning the 2011 districts as racial gerrymanders. They subsequently asked Chief Justice John Roberts, who receives appeals from the state, to allow the lower court's directive and require the changes approved by the three judges be used.

The Republicans' request was considered by the entire court and the order reflected division among the justices. Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito would have agreed to block all of the changes to the maps approved by the lower-court panel. Yet Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor would have denied the GOP's request entirely, according to the order.


[PREV] [1] ..[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].. [1875] [NEXT]



All
Legal Business
Headline Legal News
Court News
Court Watch
Legal Interview
Topics in Legal News
Attorney News
Press Release
Opinions
Legal Marketing
Politics
Courts: Bail reform working, but sus..
Maldives court delays reinstating pr..
Inmate in landmark Supreme Court cas..
GOP to take new congressional map to..
Afghans submitted 1.17 million war c..
City, landowner appeal Supreme Court..
Ohio court to hear online charter sc..
Beleaguered gunmaker Remington point..
Court: Ex-West Virginia judge inelig..
Wisconsin Supreme Court primary will..
Kushner firm seeks court change to k..
Judge to ask EU court about post-Bre..
 Law Firm Web Design Information
Law Promo has worked with attorneys, lawyers and law firms all over the world in designing beautiful law firm websites that look great on all devices, from desktop computers to mobile phones. Law Promo can construct your law firm a brand new responsive law firm website, or help you redesign your existing site to secure your place in the mobile world. Law firm website design by Law Promo


   Lawyer & Law Firm Links
Houston Car Accident Attorneys
Wrongful Death Attorneys Houston
Houston Wrongful Death
Chicago Business Law Attorney
Corporate Litigation Attorneys
www.rothlawgroup.com
Law Firm Website Designs
Law Office Website Solutions
www.webpromo.com
Amherst, Ohio Divorce Lawyer
Sylkatis Law - Child Custody
loraindivorceattorney.com
Santa Ana Workers' Compensation Lawyers
www.gentryashtonlaw.com
Fort Lauderdale DUI Lawyer
Miami Drug Crimes Lawyer
www.mishalilaw.com
Fort Washington Employment Lawyer
Attorney Marc E. Weinstein
www.meweinsteinlaw.com
San Francisco Trademark Lawyer
San Jose Trademark Lawyer
www.onulawfirm.com
 
 
Disclaimer: The content contained on the web site has been prepared by Romeo Media as a service to the internet community and is not intended to constitute legal advice or a substitute for consultation with a licensed legal professional in a particular case or circumstance. Blog postings and hosted comments are available for general educational purposes only and should not be used to assess a specific legal situation. Legal Business News for You to Reach America's Legal Professionals. Get the latest legal news and information.